Identify the real causes of ineffective leadership behaviour. Target development where it will actually change behaviour.
Most organisations have a sense that something isn't quite right with how their managers are leading. Engagement data suggests it. Escalation patterns hint at it. Senior leaders feel it.
But sensing it and seeing it clearly are two very different things.
The Upwrd Manager Capability Diagnostic gives HR, People teams and Senior Leaders a clear, evidence-based picture of where capability gaps sit across your manager population - and, crucially, why those gaps exist. So development investment goes where it will actually make the biggest difference.

Engagement scores. Performance ratings. Competency frameworks. Learning participation data.
None of these tell you where to focus first to strengthen manager capability. They capture sentiment, not behaviour. They measure individuals, not the system. They set expectations. They don't show what's actually happening.
So most organisations end up with a sense of the themes - "we need a better feedback culture," "we need more accountability" - without knowing which specific behaviours are creating the biggest risk, which cohorts of managers are struggling most, or where to start.
That's the gap the Diagnostic closes.
Most managers believe they're addressing underperformance or damaging behaviours more consistently than their teams experience it. They overestimate how clearly they set expectations. They overestimate how regularly they give feedback.
This isn't dishonesty. It's the absence of a mirror.
The Diagnostic provides one.
The Diagnostic maps management behaviour across the three dimensions that define effective leadership:
Courage
Compassion
Ownership
For each dimension, you see where behaviours are strongest and weakest across your manager population, and where the gap between self-perception and team experience is largest.


By measuring four distinct layers, we can pinpoint exactly what kind of intervention will actually work:
That's what allows us to recommend developmental solutions with confidence - from leadership standards creation, communication and expectation-setting, to leadership skills training that builds real confidence, to group or personalised leadership coaching that shifts mindset and embeds lasting behaviour change.
The behaviours we measure are defined by accredited practitioners with deep experience across people-first organisations - grounded in what teams actually experience, not what leadership theory says should matter.
Frequency-based behavioural questions: not opinion, not attitude. What managers and teams report actually happening.
Paired manager and team member surveys: surfaces the gap between how managers see themselves and how their teams experience their leadership.
Ranked findings with development recommendations: clear evidence for your investment decisions, not a data dump.
1. Cohort setup
You define your cohort structure - a team, a division, or your whole manager population. We generate unique survey links for each group, which you distribute through your own channels.
2. Surveys completed
Three short, anonymous surveys - one for team members, one for managers, one for senior leaders. Each takes under 10 minutes. The behaviours we measure are drawn from years of leadership development practitioner experience - grounded in what teams actually experience, not what leadership theory says should matter.
3. Analysis
We analyse the data - identifying where the biggest gaps sit, how far manager self-perception diverges from team experience, which behaviours to prioritise first, and the likely root causes behind the gaps.
4. Debrief session
We present findings and recommendations in a live session, walking you through the output report and what it means for your organisation.

The report moves leadership development from intuition to evidence. Six things it gives you:
✓ Priority behaviours ranked - where to focus first, not everywhere at once.
✓ Scores by manager level and function - which cohorts have the biggest gaps and where the risk is highest. Individual responses are never surfaced.
✓ Perception gap analysis - where managers' self-image diverges from how their teams experience their leadership, dimension by dimension.
✓ Likely root causes identified - whether the issue is clarity, capability, belief, or experience - so the right intervention is matched to the right problem.
✓ Recommended development formats - which solutions address each gap and why.
✓ Development roadmap - a sequenced plan you can take to leadership and act on immediately.

The Diagnostic is designed for HR, People, Talent and OD leaders or senior business leaders who:
✓ Have a sense that manager capability is an issue - but lack the data to act with confidence.
✓ Have invested in leadership development before but aren't sure it landed how it needed to.
✓ Need to make a case to senior leadership for focused, targeted investment.
✓ Want to avoid spreading development effort too thinly across too many people and programmes.
✓ Are operating in a fast-moving environment where misdiagnosing where to focus carries real cost.
We'll walk you through the Diagnostic and whether it's the right starting point for your organisation. If it isn't, we'll tell you that.
Engagement surveys tell you how people feel. The Diagnostic measures specific, observable management behaviours - how frequently they're happening and where the gaps between self-perception and team experience are largest. It tells you what to do, and why - not just that something needs doing.
Traditional 360 focuses on individual managers.
The Diagnostic looks at your manager population as a collective - identifying patterns, priorities, and risks across the whole group. It's designed to inform development strategy, not individual performance conversations.
Each survey takes under 10 minutes. Cohort setup and distribution typically takes a week. Analysis and the debrief session follow within two to three weeks of survey completion.
All surveys are anonymous.
Individual responses are never attributed to specific people. Results are presented at cohort level, with group sizes sufficient to protect confidentiality throughout.
The Diagnostic works for a single team, a division, or an entire manager population. We'll discuss the right cohort structure during your initial conversation.
The modular structure means you get exactly the content your managers need.
They leave with tools they can use immediately - not a binder that sits on a shelf.
No. The Diagnostic is designed to inform development decisions, not follow them. Many organisations use it as their starting point - so they know exactly where to invest before they spend.
Where our programmes address the gaps we find, we'll say so and explain why. Where something else would serve you better, we'll tell you that too. The goal is a roadmap that's right for your organisation - not a sales process.
You receive the full output report and a recommended development roadmap. Many organisations go on to commission one or more Upwrd programmes based on the findings. There's no obligation to - the report stands on its own.
Insights Discovery profiles, 1:1 coaching sessions, and peer coaching circles are optional enhancements priced separately.
Get in touch and we'll talk through the Diagnostic and whether it's the right starting point for your organisation.